邢唷��>� 35��2��欹�k ��zbjbj 4$棠[f棠[fl ��\\\\\��ppp8��p<��$��L�\��\\��[[[�:\�\��[��[[[��0h8a侵��F[�0<[�?�[�\[L��[��[��<��X": General Policies Regarding Misconduct in Scientific Research 1. Policy. Misconduct in academic research poses a fundamental threat to the process of academic research and creative endeavors and therefore cannot be tolerated. 2. Handling of allegations. Allegations of misconduct in academic research are a serious matter. They must be handled in a prompt and appropriate manner with due respect and concern both for the accused and the accuser. The responsibility for coordinating these procedures rests with the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs unless there is a conflict of interest, in which case the Chancellor will assume this responsibility. 3. Protection of the accused. Until a decision as to the facts of the case is made through the judicious application of the policies and procedures described in this document, the accused is to be protected by the institution. Individual parties involved must be shielded from the possible damage arising from allegations of misconduct, while ensuring a prompt and effective response to the allegations raised. The primary mechanism for this protection will be strict confidentiality. The damages resulting from spurious allegations of misconduct in academic research, and inappropriate assumptions of guilt must be minimized. 4. Protection of the accuser. The accuser is also to be protected by confidentiality and anonymity in the initial handling of the case until it becomes necessary for the identity of the accuser to be revealed to the accused and to other parties that need to know. Except under extraordinary circumstances, the accused has the right to confront the accuser. Special care in this respect must be taken in cases where the accuser is subordinate to the accused. Spurious, frivolous, or irresponsible accusations of misconduct are, themselves, a form of academic misconduct and should be dealt with accordingly. Individuals must be protected by the institution from these types of allegations. 5. Confidentiality. An investigation of an allegation of misconduct in academic research must be handled with strict confidentiality at all times. 6. Conflict of interest. A conflict of interest, real or perceived, must be avoided in the investigation of an allegation of misconduct in academic research. The membership of the investigating committee must be screened to avoid this difficulty. 7. Timeliness. Fairness and justice to the parties involved require that allegations of misconduct in academic research be resolved in a timely manner. Any deviation from the time guidelines given below should involve the preservation of the fair and appropriate handling of the investigation. When a departure from these time constraints is judged to be necessary, the extent and specifics of the departure must be documented and agreed to in writing by the parties involved. 8. Documentation. The investigation of an allegation of misconduct in academic research must be carefully documented starting with the initial allegation and proceeding through disposition and reporting of findings. Thorough documentation is important for several reasons, including potential legal proceedings that may follow from such cases. Every substantive aspect of the investigation needs to be documented. Personnel decisions or other actions arising from the disposition of the case need to be justified in the documentation. 9. Organization. There will be three stages involved in the handling of an allegation of misconduct in academic research. The first stage, which is the internal (Inquiry) stage, involves the gathering of facts as quietly and confidentially as possible with only the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, the Inquiry Committee, and the faculty member(s) named in, the allegations being informed of the proceedings. If the inquiry indicates that a formal investigation is warranted, then an Investigating Committee is formed as described below, and the second (Investigation) stage begins. At this stage, the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs informs the Chancellor that such proceedings are underway. The third (Summary) stage involves actions taken by the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs based on findings in the first two stages. 10. If in the Inquiry stage it is found that a full investigation (second stage) is appropriate, then the University has the responsibility of informing various parties both within and external to the university community. Those who need to be informed will depend on the circumstances, but may include: (l) department chairs, administrators, or other faculty who will be affected by the investigation; (2) persons who have been or are currently in collaboration with the accused; and (3) any funding agency that requires reporting under such circumstances. It is the responsibility of the Investigating Committee to determine the extent of such reporting at the outset of the official investigation. )3=>AG�� + ��TUXlLMPZ*+.;BCFR��klmno镡镉用哟佑糜佑佑糜佑佑用佑佑用佑佑糜佑用佑佑用佑佑用佑佑佑佑佑蝇èh��jh��UhCT�h]gyCJOJQJaJhCT�hl}>*CJOJQJaJhCT�hl}CJOJQJaJh橞&5丆JOJQJaJhCT�hl}5丆JOJQJaJB=>�� TULM*+BC��lnoqr�� d��gdgFd��7$8$H$gdl}opqrstuvwxyz黧篦篌黧篌�hCT�hl}CJOJQJaJh��jh��Urtuwxyz��d��7$8$H$gdl} d��gdgF21恏:pgF靶/ 班=!盃"盃#悹$�%�靶�愋x��666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666�6666666666�666666666666hH66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666�62�� 0@P`p€��2(�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�8X�V~��€�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@66666 OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH J`�J]gyNormaldとCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA ��D Default Paragraph FontRi��R0Table Normal�4� l4�a�(k ��( 0No List>�>gF0Headerd��H�$.��.gF0Header Char> >gF0Footerd��H�$.��!.gF0Footer CharR�2R gF0Balloon Textd��CJOJQJ^JaJN�/�ANgF0Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^JaJPK!檗�[Content_Types].xml瑧薔�0E鱄鼉�-J湶@%閭菐洽|廊�$韶钵UL襎B� l,�3鳛;鉹�得槣B+$�G]ミ7O侪V墎鎼j\纚揷媝/�ID�躦�6wZ醽谒0s拕钔�=D枘祑%枟;�r,q﹍E丌yDQ"Q�,=�c�8�B,活�!g倣剎MD�&閾�M呅.壛/SA鸱e淉荿換砖埒腇陆仺億S藢餍D⒇ゲ廱j|扇E�7錍�<b始N€卲�r8�恌躰擐迂FrI�.漿�1賔鉜勨詤響$2睙�1�(驇榯流檥嚚k�JV蝴1翓�/�� 脷攰Q縇该楓0斥�7�#刔ゝ嚽V娸崮虸h咑�潰c镅�M朲6/H邚 bW`軬v�钑Ts硿'鲌癇秶C秱晓t!馤Q#綣�x荽yJ]� €C:浝= 膵�(�t两R隥劕Ξ�;^к蜻e�1�/�-椄/A_Y�)骬埕�6(犓p避_埁猹�&N箲}�n€钊jzb抃�-�>��泓嚄廂嗝�;n臯埠bС*欖.�7玴媇M嬹€|麺MM�#ud9c蒴47=�匡iV菹7澨獈悝擇∶搁df脮由��5j鄳 z糌'^9�J{rJ駷袃�3A暅瀤鈢楩餟�9乩聟i�3�慟/B)L囀綬姍關x)04宜N� O'�>瞐g宫沋eH毳j��*櫋k鮞€棲譴C=h�P瞁!alf撠p惃�晳鬤屾 鯝Xl:X躒赙甖b詒�忛縕倅4鐏騍骊箇�3?ぇW訆h扮PxzSq]y z$�� ozrz餖�#�喠帕@��€€€�饞��0�( � �養 �S�� ?�lnoqrtuw{Rlnoqrtuw{3)3k{ �}Dz 橞&gFJ;U]gyl}簍€h5��CT�@X�8)�ln�@€BBBBz�@��Unknown��G��.郲x� �Times New Roman5�€Symbol3.��.郲x� �Arial7.��.鋥$� �Calibri5.��.醄`�)�TahomaC.,�.鋥$� �Calibri LightA��$B�Cambria Math"��鹦h$魦''魦'�� #�� #!��n�亗20cc3��HX � $P��l}2!xx��弉��uncp Sherry A Hunt� 鄥燆鵒h珣+'迟0p�� ,8 DPX`h�uncpNormalSherry A Hunt3Microsoft Office Word@F�#@鄰薫侵@操6a侵�� 胀諟.摋+,0�hp€�� uncp# cTitle �� !��#$%&'()��+,-./01��4��Root Entry�� F€Y�8a侵6€1Table��WordDocument��4$SummaryInformation(��"DocumentSummaryInformation8��*CompObj��r�� F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8�9瞦